Chris Lehane is without doubt one of the finest within the enterprise at making dangerous information disappear. Al Gore’s press secretary through the Clinton years, Airbnb’s chief disaster supervisor by way of each regulatory nightmare from right here to Brussels – Lehane is aware of spin. Now he’s two years into what could be his most unattainable gig but: as OpenAI’s VP of world coverage, his job is to persuade the world that OpenAI genuinely offers a rattling about democratizing synthetic intelligence whereas the corporate more and more behaves like, properly, each different tech large that’s ever claimed to be completely different.
I had 20 minutes with him on stage on the Elevate convention in Toronto earlier this week – 20 minutes to get previous the speaking factors and into the true contradictions consuming away at OpenAI’s fastidiously constructed picture. It wasn’t straightforward or completely profitable. Lehane is genuinely good at his job. He’s likable. He sounds cheap. He admits uncertainty. He even talks about waking up at 3 a.m. frightened about whether or not any of this can truly profit humanity.
However good intentions don’t imply a lot when your organization is subpoenaing critics, draining economically depressed cities of water and electrical energy, and bringing useless celebrities again to life to say your market dominance.
The corporate’s Sora drawback is basically on the root of all the things else. The video technology instrument launched final week with copyrighted materials seemingly baked proper into it. It was a daring transfer for an organization already getting sued by the New York Instances, the Toronto Star, and half the publishing trade. From a enterprise and advertising and marketing standpoint, it was additionally sensible. The invite-only app soared to the highest of the App Retailer as individuals created digital variations of themselves, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman; characters like Pikachu and Cartman of “South Park”; and useless celebrities like Tupac Shakur.
Requested what drove OpenAI’s determination to launch this latest model of Sora with these characters, Lehane supplied that Sora is a “common function expertise” just like the printing press, democratizing creativity for individuals with out expertise or sources. Even he – a self-described artistic zero – could make movies now, he stated on stage.
What he danced round is that OpenAI initially “let” rights holders decide out of getting their work used to coach Sora, which isn’t how copyright use sometimes works. Then, after OpenAI observed that folks actually appreciated utilizing copyrighted photos, it “developed” towards an opt-in mannequin. That’s not iterating. That’s testing how a lot you may get away with. (By the way in which, although the Movement Image Affiliation made some noise final week about authorized threats, OpenAI seems to have gotten away with rather a lot.)
Naturally, the scenario brings to thoughts the aggravation of publishers who accuse OpenAI of coaching on their work with out sharing the monetary spoils. Once I pressed Lehane about publishers getting reduce out of the economics, he invoked truthful use, that American authorized doctrine that’s alleged to stability creator rights in opposition to public entry to data. He referred to as it the key weapon of U.S. tech dominance.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
Perhaps. However I’d lately interviewed Al Gore – Lehane’s outdated boss – and realized anybody may merely ask ChatGPT about it as an alternative of studying my piece on TechCrunch. “It’s ‘iterative’,” I stated, “however it’s additionally a substitute.”
Lehane listened and dropped his spiel. “We’re all going to wish to determine this out,” he stated. “It’s actually glib and straightforward to take a seat right here on stage and say we have to work out new financial income fashions. However I feel we’ll.” (We’re making it up as we go, is what I heard.)
Then there’s the infrastructure query no one needs to reply truthfully. OpenAI is already working an information heart campus in Abilene, Texas, and lately broke floor on a large knowledge heart in Lordstown, Ohio, in partnership with Oracle and SoftBank. Lehane has likened the adoption of AI to the appearance of electrical energy – saying those that accessed it final are nonetheless enjoying catch-up – but OpenAI’s Stargate undertaking is seemingly concentrating on a few of those self same economically challenged locations to arrange services with their attendant and large appetites for water and electrical energy.
Requested throughout our sit-down whether or not these communities will profit or merely foot the invoice, Lehane went to gigawatts and geopolitics. OpenAI wants a couple of gigawatt of power per week, he famous. China introduced on 450 gigawatts final yr plus 33 nuclear services. If democracies need democratic AI, he stated, they should compete. “The optimist in me says this can modernize our power methods,” he’d stated, portray an image of re-industrialized America with remodeled energy grids.
It was inspiring, however it was not a solution about whether or not individuals in Lordstown and Abilene are going to look at their utility payments spike whereas OpenAI generates movies of The Infamous B.I.G. It’s very price noting that video technology is probably the most energy-intensive AI on the market.
There’s additionally a human value, one made clearer the day earlier than our interview, when Zelda Williams logged onto Instagram to beg strangers to cease sending her AI-generated movies of her late father, Robin Williams. “You’re not making artwork,” she wrote. “You’re making disgusting, over-processed hotdogs out of the lives of human beings.”
Once I requested about how the corporate reconciles this type of intimate hurt with its mission, Lehane answered by speaking about processes, together with accountable design, testing frameworks, and authorities partnerships. “There isn’t any playbook for these items, proper?”
Lehane confirmed vulnerability in some moments, saying he acknowledges the “huge duties that include” all that OpenAI does.
Whether or not or not these moments had been designed for the viewers, I imagine him. Certainly, I left Toronto pondering I’d watched a grasp class in political messaging – Lehane threading an unattainable needle whereas dodging questions on firm selections that, for all I do know, he doesn’t even agree with. Then information broke that difficult that already difficult image.
Nathan Calvin, a lawyer who works on AI coverage at a nonprofit advocacy group, Encode AI, revealed that on the similar time I used to be speaking with Lehane in Toronto, OpenAI had despatched a sheriff’s deputy to Calvin’s home in Washington, D.C., throughout dinner to serve him a subpoena. They wished his personal messages with California legislators, faculty college students, and former OpenAI staff.
Calvin says the transfer was a part of OpenAI’s intimidation ways round a brand new piece of AI regulation, California’s SB 53. He says the corporate weaponized its ongoing authorized battle with Elon Musk as a pretext to focus on critics, implying Encode was secretly funded by Musk. Calvin added that he fought OpenAI’s opposition to California’s SB 53, an AI security invoice, and that when he noticed OpenAI declare that it “labored to enhance the invoice,” he “actually laughed out loud.” In a social media skein, he went on to name Lehane, particularly, the “grasp of the political darkish arts.”
In Washington, that could be a praise. At an organization like OpenAI whose mission is “to construct AI that advantages all of humanity,” it seems like an indictment.
However what issues far more is that even OpenAI’s personal individuals are conflicted about what they’re turning into.
As my colleague Max reported final week, quite a few present and former staff took to social media after Sora 2 was launched, expressing their misgivings. Amongst them was Boaz Barak, an OpenAI researcher and Harvard professor, who wrote about Sora 2 that it’s “technically wonderful however it’s untimely to congratulate ourselves on avoiding the pitfalls of different social media apps and deepfakes.”
On Friday, Josh Achiam – OpenAI’s head of mission alignment – tweeted one thing much more exceptional about Calvin’s accusation. Prefacing his feedback by saying they had been “presumably a danger to my entire profession,” Achiam went on to jot down of OpenAI: “We will’t be doing issues that make us into a daunting energy as an alternative of a virtuous one. We have now an obligation to and a mission for all of humanity. The bar to pursue that obligation is remarkably excessive.”
It’s price pausing to consider that. An OpenAI government publicly questioning whether or not his firm is turning into “a daunting energy as an alternative of a virtuous one,” isn’t on a par with a competitor taking photographs or a reporter asking questions. That is somebody who selected to work at OpenAI, who believes in its mission, and who’s now acknowledging a disaster of conscience regardless of the skilled danger.
It’s a crystallizing second, one whose contradictions could solely intensify as OpenAI races towards synthetic common intelligence. It additionally has me pondering that the true query isn’t whether or not Chris Lehane can promote OpenAI’s mission. It’s whether or not others – together with, critically, the opposite individuals who work there – nonetheless imagine it.
