The FAA’s proposed Half 108 laws are speculated to revolutionize Past Visible Line of Sight (BVLOS) drone operations in america. And although the drone trade has largely applauded the proposed modifications, there are nonetheless some issues.
And for DJI, a kind of key sticking factors within the draft guidelines is a provision that might prohibit a key approval to both drones made in America or in any other case made in nations with “a Bilateral Airworthiness Settlement addressing UAS.”
Right here’s the issue: The U.S. doesn’t presently have any such agreements. And it feels unlikely that — given as we speak’s geopolitical atmosphere — one can be made with China, which is the place DJI drones are made.
“This rule would shut out many confirmed platforms out there that operators depend on, together with DJI,” based on an announcement by DJI, shared on its ViewPoints weblog.
And that’s not the one main political problem for DJI as of late. Simply final Friday, a U.S. choose rejected a bid by DJI to be faraway from the U.S. Protection Division’s record of firms allegedly working with Beijing’s army.
What’s Half 108?
The proposed Half 108 guidelines would change the present waiver system — which may take as much as 90 days for BVLOS approval — with a scalable, nationwide framework utilizing a two-tier authorization system. With that might come permits for smaller operations and certificates for higher-risk missions, each underneath a brand new airworthiness acceptance course of.
That airworthiness acceptance is the important thing phrase right here. As presently drafted, eligibility is proscribed to U.S. manufacturing or nations with particular “bilateral agreements.” Since no such agreements exist, American drone operators who’ve been safely flying DJI plane underneath Half 107 waivers for BVLOS operations for years would discover those self same confirmed platforms ineligible underneath the brand new framework. That’s not essentially due to security issues — it’s purely based mostly on the place they have been manufactured.
So what ought to drone pilots who need to fly DJI drones (that are identified for his or her reliability and affordability) do? DJI is pushing for a standards-based strategy as an alternative.
“We advocate that, instead, the FAA deal with mechanisms to evaluate the proof offered by producers to substantiate they meet the trade adopted consensus requirements for airworthiness, as an alternative of counting on the proposed oversight strategy typical from airworthiness certification,” based on an announcement from DJI.
Different potential challenges within the proposed Half 108 guidelines
The country-of-manufacture restriction isn’t even the one provision in Half 108 that would threaten DJI’s place. DJI recognized a number of different elements of the draft guidelines that current challenges.
Radio frequency ban: The proposed guidelines would prohibit drones utilizing 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz frequencies— the spine of DJI’s command and management methods — from working in Class 2 areas and above. That’s a large portion of operational airspace. DJI argues these frequencies have confirmed protected for years in each VLOS and BVLOS operations, with fail-safe methods defending towards interference.
Automation-only mandate: Half 108 closely favors extremely automated methods the place no pilot instantly controls the plane. This is able to exclude most present DJI platforms, even subtle options like DJI Dock and FlightHub 2 that mix automation with “pilot within the loop” architectures. The issue? Most current BVLOS operations underneath Half 107 waivers — safety patrols, Drone-as-First-Responder packages, infrastructure inspections — require the power to change between automated and guide flight mid-mission.
Extreme information reporting: The draft guidelines would require operators to share all BVLOS flight information with producers. DJI calls this “pointless and burdensome for all events concerned.” The corporate proposed as an alternative that operators solely submit incident or accident data by means of manufacturer-provided instruments.
Website-by-site approvals: As an alternative of making a streamlined nationwide framework, operators would want FAA approval for each particular person website. That primarily recreates the previous waiver system Half 108 was supposed to interchange. DJI argues that if operators can meet standardized security circumstances already authorised for sure operations, they need to be capable of fly wherever within the nation.
What this implies for the drone trade
Positive, DJI is looking out these points as a method of defending its market share, however DJI has been emphasizing the influence that such guidelines would have on public security businesses and different service suppliers who depend on DJI drones.
Many fireplace departments, police businesses, search and rescue groups and emergency responders throughout america use DJI drones. They are usually far cheaper than American-made options. If Half 108 prohibits DJI drones from BVLOS operations, it might probably set again the operational capabilities of public security businesses and different companies (or price taxpayers and clients extra money to fund costlier DJI options).
U.S. political issues about Chinese language tech firms
The Justice Division has been clear in courtroom filings that the U.S. “has lengthy expressed important issues in regards to the nationwide safety menace posed by the connection between Chinese language expertise firms and the Chinese language state.”
Final Friday, U.S. District Choose Paul Friedman rejected DJI’s bid to be faraway from the Pentagon’s record of firms allegedly working with Beijing’s army, saying the Protection Division had “substantial proof” that DJI contributes to the “Chinese language protection industrial base.” DJI maintains it “is neither owned nor managed by the Chinese language army” and is evaluating its authorized choices, however the precedent isn’t encouraging. In reality, Choose Friedman made the same ruling for China-based lidar producer Hesai Group in July.
What you are able to do now
The general public remark interval for Half 108 (Docket FAA-2025-1908) closes October 6, 2025 at 11:59 ET (that’s subsequent Monday). The FAA is required to think about substantive public suggestions earlier than finalizing the principles.
To submit your individual remark, click on the blue remark field on the discover on the Rules.gov web site. So far as what to jot down in your feedback? Take into account stating:
- Why this issues to you as a commenter
- How the proposal would have an effect on you if adopted as written
- What would make it higherwith constructive options
And simply from my expertise: feedback written in your individual phrases and grounded in actual operational expertise carry probably the most weight.
Associated
Uncover extra from The Drone Woman
Subscribe to get the newest posts despatched to your e-mail.
